In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency mining, selecting the right EtHash miner can make the difference between profitable ventures and costly missteps. With Ethereum’s shift to Proof-of-Stake in 2022, EtHash miners have pivoted toward coins like Ethereum Classic (ETC), Ethereum Fair (ETHF), EthereumPoW (ETHW), and even Zilliqa. As of August 2025, ETC remains a top contender, trading around $20-25 per coin according to data from CoinGecko, with network hashrate stabilizing amid fluctuating market conditions. This guide dives deep into comparing three powerhouse EtHash miners: the Antminer E11, Jasminer X44-P, and iPollo V2. We’ll explore specs, ROI potential, suitability for various users and scenarios, and tie in real-world mining trends to help you decide.
Whether you’re a hobbyist dipping into home mining or scaling a professional farm, understanding these models’ nuances is key. Drawing from user reviews on platforms like Reddit’s r/EtherMining and expert analyses from sites such as WhatIsEthereum, we’ll uncover why one might edge out the others in efficiency, while another shines in raw power.
Key Specifications at a Glance
To kick things off, let’s break down the core technical specs. These miners are all optimized for the EtHash algorithm, but their designs reflect different priorities—from raw hashing muscle to energy thriftiness. Here’s a side-by-side comparison in a handy table for quick reference:
| Feature | Antminer E11 | Jasminer X44-P | iPollo V2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hash Rate | 9,500 MH/s ± 3% | 23,400 MH/s ± 3% | 10,000 MH/s ± 3% |
| Power Consumption | 2,470W ± 5% | 2,340W ± 5% | 1,500W ± 10% |
| Efficiency | 0.26 J/MH ± 5% | 0.10 J/MH ± 5% | 0.15 J/MH ± 10% |
| Memory | 5.625 GB | 12 GB | Not specified (typically 6-8 GB for similar models) |
| Price | $4,256 | $4,999 | $3,999 |
| Dimensions | 407 x 195.5 x 289 mm | 212 x 300 x 374 mm | 430 x 195 x 290 mm |
| Weight | 15.85 kg | 14 kg | 16.5 kg |
| Cooling | Air cooling (2 fans) | Air cooling (3 fans) | Air cooling (4 fans) |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years | 2 years |
From this snapshot, the Jasminer X44-P dominates in hash rate and efficiency, making it a beast for high-output setups. Meanwhile, the iPollo V2 stands out for lower power draw, ideal for cost-conscious miners. The Antminer E11 strikes a balance but lags slightly in efficiency.
Performance Breakdown: Hash Rate, Efficiency, and Power Usage
Diving deeper, performance isn’t just about numbers—it’s how they interplay in real mining environments. The Jasminer X44-P‘s staggering 23.4 GH/s hash rate means it can process blocks faster, potentially yielding more ETC rewards in competitive pools. According to mining calculator tools on WhatToMine, at current ETC difficulty levels (around 2.5 PH/s network hashrate), this could translate to daily earnings of about $15-20 before electricity costs, assuming $0.10/kWh.
Efficiency is where things get interesting. The Jasminer’s 0.10 J/MH is a game-changer, especially as electricity prices rise globally—think Europe’s energy crisis impacting miners, as noted in a 2024 Bloomberg report. This low joules-per-megahash means less heat generation and lower bills, appealing to eco-conscious operators. In contrast, the Antminer E11‘s 0.26 J/MH feels dated, though its robust build (from Bitmain’s proven lineage) ensures reliability in humid or dusty farms.
The iPollo V2, with 0.15 J/MH and only 1,500W draw, excels in power-sensitive scenarios. User forums like BitcoinTalk praise iPollo models for quiet operation, thanks to four fans dispersing heat efficiently. However, its 10 GH/s might underwhelm in high-difficulty spikes, as ETC’s volatility—peaking at $45 in early 2025 per CoinMarketCap—demands scalable power.
ROI Analysis: Crunching the Numbers
Return on Investment (ROI) is the ultimate litmus test. Let’s model this based on August 2025 conditions: ETC at $22, electricity at $0.10/kWh (U.S. average), and a 10% pool fee. Using tools from Minerstat, here’s an approximate breakdown:
- Antminer E11: Daily profit ~$4-6 after costs. At $4,256 upfront, ROI could hit in 12-18 months, assuming stable prices. Its lower hash rate means slower breakeven, but durability (evident in 4.48/5 user ratings) reduces downtime risks.
- Jasminer X44-P: Nets $12-15 daily. With a $4,999 price tag, ROI might arrive in 8-12 months. Experts on Reddit highlight its memory (12GB) for handling larger DAG files, future-proofing against ETC upgrades.
- iPollo V2: Around $5-7 daily profit. Cheaper at $3,999, it could ROI in 10-15 months. Its edge? Lower entry barrier and energy savings, saving $50-100 monthly on power versus rivals.
Market fluctuations add nuance: If ETC surges to $30 (as predicted by some analysts citing DeFi growth on ETC), ROIs shorten across the board. Conversely, a bear market could extend them, favoring efficient models like Jasminer.
Suitability for Different Mining Scenarios
Not all setups are equal. For home miners operating in residential spaces, noise and heat are paramount. The iPollo V2‘s four-fan system keeps decibels low (around 70dB, per user tests), and its compact size fits garages or basements. Power draw under 1,500W avoids tripping breakers, making it ideal for hobbyists mining ETC part-time while dabbling in Zilliqa for diversification.
In large-scale mining farms, scale trumps subtlety. Here, the Jasminer X44-P shines with its monster hash rate, allowing farms to deploy fewer units for equivalent output—cutting maintenance overheads. A 2025 report from The Block notes that efficiency-focused rigs like this reduce operational costs by 20-30% in industrial settings with cheap hydro power.
The Antminer E11 fits mid-sized operations, like community co-ops or small warehouses. Its air cooling handles variable climates well, and Bitmain’s ecosystem (firmware updates via their app) simplifies management for teams without deep tech expertise.
Recommendations for Diverse Mining Groups
Tailoring to user profiles reveals more insights. Beginners should lean toward the iPollo V2: Affordable, user-friendly setup, and positive reviews (4.44/5) emphasize plug-and-play ease. It pairs well with beginner-friendly pools like Ethermine, where low power keeps initial bills manageable amid ETC’s 10-15% monthly volatility.
Experienced miners might prefer the Antminer E11 for its tweakability—overclocking potential boosts hash by 5-10%, as shared in mining wikis. Veterans optimizing for multi-coin strategies (ETC + ZIL) appreciate its balance, especially with ETC’s halvings influencing rewards.
For enterprise-level or profit-maximizing groups, the Jasminer X44-P is unmatched. Its superior efficiency aligns with sustainability trends; a Cambridge study underscores how efficient ASICs cut carbon footprints, appealing to ESG-focused investors. In regions like Texas with renewable grids, this model’s ROI accelerates.
Deeper Insights: Market Ties and Expert Views
Beyond specs, these miners reflect broader trends. ETC’s ecosystem, bolstered by projects like HebeBlock, maintains demand for EtHash gear despite Ethereum’s pivot. The Jasminer’s 12GB memory future-proofs against DAG size increases (currently ~5GB for ETC), a point echoed in Medium articles predicting 20% DAG growth by 2026.
Critics on forums note Antminer’s higher failure rates in extreme heat, but its community support (Bitmain forums) mitigates this. iPollo’s quieter fans address noise complaints common in urban mining, per Trustpilot reviews. Overall, with global mining shifting to renewables (per IEA reports), efficiency kings like Jasminer lead.
Final Thoughts: Making Your Choice
Choosing between the Antminer E11, Jasminer X44-P, and iPollo V2 boils down to your goals: Power for farms? Go Jasminer. Budget and ease? iPollo. Balanced reliability? Antminer. Factor in local electricity ($0.05/kWh in hydro-rich areas boosts all), coin prices, and scalability. Always cross-check with calculators and communities—mining’s dynamic, but informed picks yield lasting rewards.